Lissette Calveiro spent $10,000 pretending to be rich on Instagram. A $700 flight to Houston. A $1,000 vintage Louis Vuitton bag. Dinners at trendy restaurants she couldn’t afford. She made $40,000 annually as a Miami publicist while performing wealth for followers who assumed she had money. Moreover, Cornell University research confirms she wasn’t alone—most successful Instagram influencers either came from family wealth or went into debt creating the illusion.
The Fantasy: What “If I Was A Rich Girl” Actually Means
The phrase originates from Fiddler on the Roof’s “If I Were A Rich Man”—Tevye the milkman daydreaming about material comforts that wealth would bring. He imagines a big house with staircases “leading nowhere, just for show.” Poultry filling his yard so the town would hear his wealth. Time to study rather than work constantly.
Gwen Stefani transformed this into modern fantasy in 2004. Her version imagines buying out Vivienne Westwood and owning Hollywood mansions. Nevertheless, the core remains identical—both versions represent wishful thinking about a life beyond current means. Furthermore, both acknowledge that the fantasy itself might be more satisfying than reality.
The Instagram Translation
Social media transformed “if I was a rich girl” from hypothetical daydream into performative reality. Instagram doesn’t traffic in “if”—it demands “is.” Consequently, millions of women don’t wonder what wealth would feel like. Instead, they manufacture the appearance regardless of actual finances.
This creates a strange paradox. The original song celebrated honest longing for a better life. Today’s version demands pretending you already have it. Therefore, authenticity gives way to performance, and fantasy becomes expensive obligation.
The Debt Behind The Feed: Real Numbers
The cost of performing “if I was a rich girl” lifestyle far exceeds what most admit publicly. Nevertheless, research and confessional accounts reveal the financial carnage behind perfectly curated feeds.
The $10,000 Entry Price
Calveiro’s $10,000 debt represents the low end of influencer spending. She accumulated this between 2013-2016 while earning $40,000 annually. Additionally, she tracked her spending weekly and paid it off in 18 months through extreme lifestyle changes. Her story provides the clearest picture of starter-level Instagram wealth performance costs.
Moreover, her spending wasn’t frivolous from an influencer perspective. The Austin trip generated content. The vintage Louis Vuitton provided status signaling. Trendy restaurant meals created lifestyle proof. Each purchase served the performance. Nevertheless, none generated sufficient income to justify the expense.
The UK Study: £400 Monthly Spending
Credit Karma research found Gen Z and millennials collectively spend £400 monthly imitating Instagram stars. Furthermore, seven in ten go into debt as a result. Twenty-five percent report their debt hinders long-term financial goals like home ownership. Additionally, 31% can’t afford everyday essentials while maintaining the performance.
This translates to roughly $6,000 annually per person chasing the “if I was a rich girl” aesthetic. Multiply that across millions of participants and the fake wealth industry becomes a multi-billion dollar phenomenon. Therefore, performing wealth has become more economically significant than many realize.
The $130,000+ Stories
Some influencer couples accumulated even more dramatic debt. One couple paid off $130,912 in less than three years by selling their RV, drastically cutting expenses, and aggressive debt repayment. Another individual tackled $149,000 in two and a half years. These weren’t lifestyle debt from performing wealth—they were combined student loans and consumer debt. Nevertheless, they illustrate the financial stress that “keeping up” creates.
The Fake Wealth Industry: What You’re Actually Buying
A entire ecosystem exists to help non-wealthy people perform wealth on Instagram. Moreover, Vice documented this industry’s mechanics, revealing the specific props and services that create illusions.
Empty Designer Boxes on Depop
On Depop, sellers dedicate entire accounts to empty luxury packaging. One seller posted over 600 empty boxes and bags. The prices shock: a Gucci hat box costs £35, a Dior shoe box £30, four Hermes ribbons £20, and a Louboutin box with gift bag £55. Consequently, influencers buy these empties to photograph, creating the impression of shopping sprees that never happened.
One seller reported that an influencer who bought Pandora boxes from her now has genuine sponsorship deals with luxury brands. Therefore, fake-it-till-you-make-it sometimes works. Nevertheless, this remains the exception rather than rule. Most people buying empty boxes never convert performance into actual brand partnerships.
Fake Private Jets and Photo Studios
Studios now offer fake private jet interiors for photoshoots. Influencers pay to sit in these sets, creating content that implies wealth they don’t possess. Additionally, green screen technology allows photoshopping into luxury locations without travel costs. Therefore, the “if I was a rich girl” fantasy becomes purchasable in hour-long increments.
The economics make sense from a performer’s perspective. Why spend $20,000 chartering an actual private jet when $200 buys a photo session that looks identical? Nevertheless, the deception corrodes authenticity that ostensibly makes influencers valuable to brands.
Rent The Runway: The Middle Ground
Some influencers used rental services rather than outright fakes. Mackenzie Newcomb joined Rent the Runway in 2016 but never disclosed rentals to followers. She would tag brands as if she owned pieces. Consequently, followers assumed wealth that didn’t exist while she maintained plausible deniability about lying.
This represents a grayer area. The clothes were real designer items. She actually wore them. Nevertheless, presenting rentals as purchases misrepresents financial status. Therefore, even the “honest” version of performance involves deception about means.
The Psychology: Why We Perform Wealth We Don’t Have
Understanding why millions participate in expensive pretense requires examining the psychological mechanisms driving performance. Moreover, research reveals specific cognitive patterns that trap people in destructive cycles.
The Comparison Trap
Social media creates unprecedented comparison opportunities. Previously, people compared themselves to immediate social circles—neighbors, coworkers, extended family. Instagram exploded comparison scope to include celebrities, wealthy strangers, and heavily edited fantasy versions of everyone’s lives.
Furthermore, Manulife Bank research found that 40% of Canadians with debt admit living beyond their means. Additionally, 12% directly relate debt levels to too many costly outings with friends and family. The bank’s CEO identified fear of missing out as the primary driver. Everyone appears to live perfectly on Instagram. Consequently, people spend money trying to match illusions.
The Business Expense Rationalization
Calveiro notes that influencers justify expensive purchases as business expenses. This mental accounting trick allows spending that would otherwise trigger guilt or restraint. If the Austin trip generates content, it’s “work.” If the designer bag appears in photos, it’s “equipment.” Therefore, normal spending guardrails disappear under cover of entrepreneurship.
This rationalization becomes particularly dangerous because it contains partial truth. Influencer income does require investment in appearance, experiences, and props. Nevertheless, the breakeven point often never arrives. Therefore, people accumulate debt funding “businesses” that never become profitable.
The Cognitive Dissonance Solution
Once someone invests significantly in the performance, admitting it’s not working becomes psychologically difficult. Cognitive dissonance theory predicts that people will instead double down, convincing themselves success is imminent. Therefore, the $5,000 in debt becomes $10,000, which becomes $20,000, as each additional expense gets justified as “necessary to finally break through.”
Additionally, influencers report being largely unaware of payment methods’ influence on decisions. They disagreed that they were more impulsive with credit cards despite behavioral evidence proving otherwise. Therefore, the mechanisms driving destructive spending often operate below conscious awareness.
The Hamptons Version: Elite Performance Costs
The “if I was a rich girl” phenomenon operates differently in the Hamptons versus mainstream Instagram. Nevertheless, performance pressure exists even—perhaps especially—among the genuinely wealthy.
When Millionaires Feel Poor
In Southampton society, wealth becomes relative. A family worth $5 million lives among families worth $50 million and $500 million. Consequently, even objectively wealthy people experience inadequacy. Their second home looks modest compared to neighboring compounds. Their yacht seems small against mega-yachts in the marina.
This creates pressure to perform wealth beyond actual means even for the rich. Therefore, Hamptons residents might lease rather than own cars, rent rather than charter boats, and carefully curate which events they attend. The performance serves different purposes—maintaining social standing rather than gaining followers—but the mechanism remains identical.
The Summer Rental Economics
Southampton summer rentals illustrate performative wealth economics at every level. A modest house rents for $50,000 monthly. Desirable properties command $100,000-$300,000 for summer season. The most exclusive estates exceed $1 million for three months.
Many renters stretch beyond comfortable budgets to secure Southampton addresses. They sacrifice year-round financial security for three months of Hamptons access. Additionally, the rental itself represents just baseline cost. Club memberships, restaurant spending, childcare, and activity costs multiply rapidly. Therefore, a $200,000 summer easily becomes $300,000 all-in.
The Social Media Amplification
Instagram transformed Hamptons performance from local phenomenon to global spectacle. Previously, keeping up with the Joneses meant impressing immediate neighbors. Now it means broadcasting to thousands of followers. Consequently, every beach day, polo match, and charity gala becomes content opportunity requiring perfect execution.
This raises the performance stakes. A flawed outfit that neighbors might forgive becomes permanent internet record. Therefore, Hamptons residents now compete simultaneously in local social hierarchies and global digital ones. The pressure intensifies while the ROI on performing wealth diminishes.
The Brand Deal Myth: Why Performance Rarely Pays
The core premise driving “if I was a rich girl” performance is that appearing wealthy attracts brand deals that make you actually wealthy. Cornell research reveals this rarely works as imagined.
The Privilege Reality
Many top influencers came from existing economic and social privilege. They didn’t perform wealth to attract brands—they had wealth that made brand partnerships organic. Therefore, the causal arrow runs opposite to what aspiring influencers assume. Brands partner with the already-wealthy, who then appear even wealthier through sponsorships.
Additionally, TikTok’s virality emphasis changed dynamics somewhat by emphasizing relatability. Nevertheless, virality doesn’t necessarily translate to longevity or income. Someone might achieve temporary fame without building sustainable business. Therefore, the pathway from performance to profit remains unclear for most participants.
The Authenticity Premium
Independent influencer marketing consultant Scott Guthrie warns that pretending wealth can actually prevent brand deals. Flaunting fake wealth appears obvious to sophisticated marketers. Furthermore, creators masquerading as brand ambassadors may tarnish brands rather than promote them.
Guthrie suggests authenticity provides better pathways to luxury partnerships. Tapping into values supporting brand positioning matters more than appearing wealthy. Therefore, the strategy of faking wealth until brands notice might actively sabotage the goal it pursues.
The Math Doesn’t Work
Even successful influencers often struggle financially. Emma Rose Léger never allowed credit card debt but “definitely drained my bank account multiple times.” Her 2018 Coachella posts showed colorful paradise. Reality involved increased credit limits to buy tickets and no spending money upon arrival.
The highest-paid influencer posts can earn $1 million. Nevertheless, that represents the extreme top of the market. For every influencer earning seven figures, thousands earn nothing while spending thousands. Therefore, the expected value of influencer investment remains negative for most participants.
The Exit Strategy: Getting Out of Performance Debt
Escaping “if I was a rich girl” performance debt requires specific strategies. Moreover, those who successfully exited provide roadmaps for others trapped in the cycle.
Calveiro’s 18-Month Plan
Calveiro paid off $10,000 in 18 months through systematic approach. First, she spent 30 minutes weekly reviewing credit card statements and updating a spreadsheet tracking expenses and debt. This created awareness of actual spending patterns. Additionally, she found a cheaper apartment despite longer commute and joined Rent the Runway to maintain varied looks without ownership costs.
Her template now helps others track assets, income, budget, and debt. She emphasizes that people shouldn’t feel ashamed of debt and recommends accountability buddies or online communities for support. Therefore, community and transparency accelerate recovery from individual shame and secrecy.
The Lifestyle Recalibration
Several influencers described moving to lower cost-of-living areas to accelerate debt payoff. One moved to China to teach English, allowing aggressive debt reduction while maintaining international travel. Others sold cars, downsized apartments, and eliminated discretionary spending. Therefore, escaping performance debt often requires dramatic lifestyle change rather than incremental adjustment.
Additionally, successful debt elimination involved increasing income simultaneously with cutting expenses. Multiple side hustles, career changes, and entrepreneurial efforts supplemented primary income. Therefore, the math works better attacking from both sides—earning more and spending less—rather than spending cuts alone.
The Authenticity Pivot
Some influencers found that sharing debt struggles authentically created better engagement than performing wealth. Calveiro now has nearly 60,000 followers as an influencer coach. Her honesty about financial challenges attracts audience that fake wealth never could. Therefore, the performance that seemed necessary might actually have prevented the success it pursued.
Moreover, debt payoff accounts on Instagram demonstrate appetite for financial reality content. The hashtag #debtfreecommunity has been used over half a million times. Therefore, performing “if I was broke but getting out of it” might attract more genuine engagement than performing “if I was a rich girl.”
The Alternative: Actual Wealth Building Versus Performance
The irony is that money spent performing wealth could build actual wealth if redirected. Moreover, the gap between these paths illustrates the destructive nature of social media pressure.
The $6,000 Annual Opportunity Cost
The UK study found £400 monthly spending on Instagram imitation. That’s approximately $6,000 annually. Invested in index funds averaging 10% returns, $6,000 annually becomes $100,000 in ten years, $350,000 in twenty years, and over $1 million in thirty years. Therefore, one generation of “if I was a rich girl” performance costs actual millionaire status.
Additionally, the debt accumulation creates negative compound interest working against wealth building. Someone carrying $10,000 credit card debt at 24% interest pays $2,400 annually just in interest. Therefore, they need to earn $8,400 above living expenses to break even before starting wealth accumulation.
The Skills Investment Alternative
Money spent on performance props could fund education, certifications, or business investments that generate actual returns. A $10,000 coding bootcamp might lead to $80,000 salary. A $5,000 investment in proper business infrastructure might build sustainable income. Therefore, the same resources produce opposite outcomes depending on allocation.
Furthermore, the time invested in content creation and curation could build actual skills with market value. Calveiro now coaches influencers, monetizing lessons from her mistakes. Therefore, the path to actual income often lies through authenticity and expertise rather than performance and illusion.
The Future: Where “If I Was A Rich Girl” Goes From Here
Social media’s wealth performance dynamics continue evolving. Moreover, several trends suggest the landscape will shift significantly in coming years.
The Transparency Requirement
FTC regulations now require disclosure of sponsored content and gifted items. Additionally, audiences have become more sophisticated at detecting fake wealth. Therefore, the performance becomes both legally riskier and less effective. This might force more authenticity or drive performers to more elaborate deception.
Furthermore, platforms like TikTok reward relatability over aspiration in many niches. The “if I was a rich girl” content competes with “look at my actual broke life” content that performs equally well. Therefore, the economic incentive to fake wealth diminishes as authentic struggle gains traction.
The Quiet Luxury Counter-Movement
The rise of “quiet luxury” and “stealth wealth” aesthetics suggests cultural fatigue with obvious performance. Wealthy people increasingly avoid logo-heavy display. Therefore, performing wealth might become gauche even as actual wealth becomes less visible. This creates impossible situation for performers—they can’t signal status using the same markers actual wealthy people abandoned.
Additionally, this shift reflects broader cultural changes around sustainability and consumption. Younger generations express more skepticism about materialism even while participating in social media. Therefore, the “if I was a rich girl” fantasy itself might lose cultural potency.
Final Thoughts: The Real Meaning of Rich
The original “If I Were A Rich Man” concluded with Tevye asking God whether wealth would spoil some vast eternal plan. The question acknowledges that riches might create more problems than they solve. Modern “if I was a rich girl” performance proves this true in ways Tevye never imagined.
Performing wealth creates actual poverty—financial, psychological, and relational. The debt damages finances obviously. The inauthenticity corrodes self-concept. The comparison destroys contentment. Therefore, the pursuit of appearing rich guarantees feeling poor regardless of actual resources.
Moreover, the performance trap particularly damages those who could genuinely benefit from wealth accumulation. The $6,000 annually spent imitating rich people could compound into actual security over decades. Therefore, Instagram’s “if I was a rich girl” aesthetic primarily serves to keep non-wealthy people non-wealthy while enriching the actual wealthy who sell the props.
Ultimately, the question shifts from “if I was a rich girl” to “what would make me actually rich?” The answer has little to do with Instagram performance and everything to do with the boring wealth-building fundamentals that social media makes invisible: spend less than you earn, invest the difference, build skills with market value, and cultivate contentment with less. Not sexy. Not aspirational. But actually effective.
Connect With Social Life Magazine
Feature Article Ideas / Advertising / Brand Partnership Inquiries:
Contact Social Life Magazine
Polo Hamptons Tickets, Cabanas, Brand Sponsorships:
Visit Polo Hamptons
Join Our Email List:
Subscribe Now
Social Life Magazine Print Subscription:
Subscribe to Print Edition
Support Our Publication:
Donate $5 to Social Life Magazine
Want to be featured in our Rich Girl series? Social Life Magazine profiles the women redefining wealth. Contact us to share your story.
Related Articles
